Show Sidebar Log in
NYC Digital Humanities
  • Home
  • People
  • Groups
  • Calendar
  • Student Award
  • NYCDH Week
  • Site-Wide Activity
  • Help
  • About
    • NYCDH Logo

Group Admins

  • Profile picture of Kimon Keramidas
  • Profile picture of Matthew K. Gold

NYCDH Announcements

Public Group active 1 day, 5 hours ago

Join this group to receive announcements about all-NYCDH activities or other news of interest to the whole community. And use this group to send such announcements. When you join, you may adjust your settings on how much email you’d like to receive.

Reminder: Friday April 14, The History of Negation in French

Tagged: Corpus, French, Linguistics

  • This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 8 years, 2 months ago by Angus Grieve-Smith.
Viewing 0 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • April 13, 2017 at 1:55 pm #2684
      Angus Grieve-Smith
      Participant

      Please attend the fifth of our six Dressler colloquia of the school year.
      Have you ever wondered why there are two negator morphemes in French (ne
      … pas), or why the situation was once the same in English (its use of NOT
      started as a “ne … not” construction)? We will learn how the French
      situation arose, in more detail than textbooks usually present, based on
      Angus Grieve-Smith’s fascinating research. In other words:

      *THE HISTORY OF NEGATION IN FRENCH*
      Friday, April FOURTEENTH
      4 PM
      Mudd 327 *(note: NOT Hamilton 703)*

      Angus Grieve Smith
      Columbia University Information technology

      The basic outlines of the history of negation in French are well-known:
      that in Old French sentences were negated with ne alone; that ne began to
      be supplemented with pas, which also means “step”; that recently people
      have been using pas by itself to negate sentences. This process is the
      best-known example of Jespersen’s Cycle, which has also produced English not,
      German nicht and Italian mica.

      Looking more closely at this process through a corpus of theatrical texts,
      we find some intriguing details. The use of ne alone or ne … pas conveyed
      a semantic and pragmatic distinction in Old French, which appears to have
      been lost around the sixteenth century. From the sixteenth through
      twentieth centuries, the proportion of sentence negations using ne … pas
      rises in a classic S-curve shape. The shift from ne alone to ne … pas did
      not proceed at random, but in a definite pattern defined by the
      entrenchment of high-frequency patterns.

      Altogether, these events provide support for usage-based theories of
      language change. In particular, these theories model how language users
      forget which construction to use and fall back on the one that they
      remember as being more general. Patterns that are used more frequently are
      then more resistant to this kind of change.

      See you there!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 0 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In
Group logo of NYCDH Announcements
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Announcements
  • Docs
  • Members 746

Groups

Newest | Active | Popular | Alphabetical
  • Group logo of NYCDH Announcements
    NYCDH Announcements
    746 members
  • Group logo of Digital Pedagogy
    Digital Pedagogy
    110 members
  • Group logo of NYC Omeka Group
    NYC Omeka Group
    90 members
  • Group logo of digiBar
    digiBar
    78 members
  • Group logo of NYC Digital Art History
    NYC Digital Art History
    73 members
Powered by Commons In A Box
css.php
Skip to toolbar
  • About WordPress
    • About WordPress
    • Get Involved
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Learn WordPress
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • Register