Show Sidebar Log in
NYC Digital Humanities
  • Home
  • People
  • Groups
  • Calendar
  • Student Award
  • NYCDH Week
  • Site-Wide Activity
  • Help
  • About
    • NYCDH Logo

Group Admins

  • Profile picture of Kimon Keramidas
  • Profile picture of Matthew K. Gold

NYCDH Announcements

Public Group active 11 hours, 13 minutes ago

Join this group to receive announcements about all-NYCDH activities or other news of interest to the whole community. And use this group to send such announcements. When you join, you may adjust your settings on how much email you’d like to receive.

Rens Bod. "Empiricism in the Humanities: Patterns versus Interpretations"

  • This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 7 years, 11 months ago by Alex Gil.
Viewing 0 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • March 31, 2015 at 11:40 am #1061
      Alex Gil
      Participant

      Dear all,

      Next Wednesday, April 8, at 6:15pm, we welcome Rens Bod at the Heyman Center as part of our #xpmethods encounters “on method in the humanities.” You may know Bod from his book, A New History of the Humanities: The Search for Principles and Patterns from Antiquity to the Present. The event promises to be very lively and topical for humanists of all stripes (abstract below).

      The event is free and open to the public. If you’re coming from outside CU, do let me know.

      Abstract

      How empirical are the humanities? For over a century, empiricism has almost exclusively been attributed to the sciences. The sciences search for patterns and laws, while the humanities aim at understanding unique events. The sciences try to explain the world, while the humanities aim at interpreting it. The sciences aim for objectivity while the humanities are subjective and speculative. These oppositions are much older than C.P. Snow’s well-known two cultures debate; they can be traced back to Antiquity and are – quite surprisingly — rooted in the disciplines that we nowadays call ‘humanities’. From at least the third century BCE onwards, there have been two kinds of practices in philology, historiography, poetics, the study of art and the study of music. On the one hand people searched for patterns and regularities, while on the other hand they searched for interpretations and the exceptional.

      Both approaches have not disappeared from the humanities since then. In my talk I will sketch the longue durée of the pattern-seeking tradition in the humanities and compare it to the interpretative tradition. I shall argue that interpretations were not always in opposition to pattern-seeking but were often constructed on the patterns found. The common wisdom that the humanities are moving towards science when they search for patterns is mistaken. Instead, the search for patterns has been a continuous line in the humanities from Antiquity onwards.

      Attachments:
      You must be logged in to view attached files.
  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 0 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In
Group logo of NYCDH Announcements
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Announcements
  • Docs
  • Members 741

Groups

Newest | Active | Popular | Alphabetical
  • Group logo of NYCDH Announcements
    NYCDH Announcements
    741 members
  • Group logo of Digital Pedagogy
    Digital Pedagogy
    109 members
  • Group logo of NYC Omeka Group
    NYC Omeka Group
    90 members
  • Group logo of digiBar
    digiBar
    79 members
  • Group logo of NYC Digital Art History
    NYC Digital Art History
    73 members
Powered by Commons In A Box
css.php
Skip to toolbar
  • About WordPress
    • About WordPress
    • WordPress.org
    • Documentation
    • Support
    • Feedback
  • Log In
  • Register